Alihasan Vohra v. Assets Reconstruction Company(India) Ltd. & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Default dismissal order due to appellant's lack of instruction and failure to respond to notices.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 175/2011
Between
Alihasan Vohra … Appellant/s V/s.
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd …Respondent/s &Ors.
Mr. PrashantPandita/w Mr. Jay Pandit, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 29/07/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant submits that he has no instruction and filed pursis for withdrawal of vakalatnama. It is stated that the letter has been issued by Ld. Counsel for the Appellant to the Appellant but there was no response. The matter has been adjourned a number of times for the Appellant to appear. No steps have been taken to serve notice on the Respondents.
Under the circumstances, I assume that the Applicant is not keen on proceeding with the matter. Hence, Misc. Appeal stands dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-11
1
Alihasan Vohra
Assets Reconstruction Company (India) Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court