The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal condoned the 164-day delay in filing the Misc. Appeal, finding the Appellants' explanation regarding the restraining order sufficient. The matter was posted for further proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
M.A. No. 683/2017 (CoD) In Misc. Appeal No. 47/2017
Between
Mr. Manish Ishwarlal Lalwani (Jain) & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms. Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 29/07/2022:-
1
Sd/Chairperson
mks-14
2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay of 164 days in filing the Misc. Appeal should be allowed?
Whether the reason provided by the Appellants for the delay justifies condonation?
Mr. Manish Ishwarlal Lalwani (Jain) & Ors.
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
