Order remanding the post on the reference matter to both parties for issuing fresh notice due to absence of vakalatnama and intervening pandemic conditions, with no substantive decision on the appeal.
Notice to be issued to respondents and appellants to re-file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc Appeal No.17/2020
Between
M/s. Chordia International & Ors. … Appellant/s V/s.
Punjab National Bank …Respondent/s
Mr. Harjot Singh Hang, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated : 13/06/2022 :-
Advocate Ms. Savita Nangare was appearing for the Respondent No. 1.
Advocate Mr. Satish Sharma was appearing for the Respondent No. 2.
Respondent No. 1 had sought time for filing reply but so far no reply has been filed.
The Appellants are directed to serve notice on the Respondents once again even though there was representation made by two counsels purportedly appearing for the Respondent No. 1 & 2. No Vakalatnama has been filed.
Hence, considering the facts that there was intervening pandemic, fresh notice shall be issued to the Respondents and the Appellants shall take steps.
Post on 29.07.2022 for hearing.
mks-2
1
M/s. Chordia International & Ors.
Punjab National Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
