Dena Bank v. Rukunuddin G Sheikh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Tribunal allowed the IA seeking substitution of the appellant from Dena Bank with Bank of Baroda due to merger and directed the amendment.
What did the court decide?
IA allowed; Appellant directed to substitute Appellant with Bank of Baroda.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 193/2022 (Amendment)
IN
Appeal No. 172/2014
Between
Dena Bank … Appellant/s V/s. Rukunuddin G. Sheikh & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/by M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co. Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Kushal Sawant, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 2.
Mr. Prashant Pandit, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, i/by M/s. T. N. Tripathi & Co. Advocate for Respondent No. 6.
-: Order dated : 08/06/2022 :-
I.A. No. 193/2022 is for substituting the Appellant Dena Bank with the Bank of Baroda, since the former bank has merged with the later.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dena Bank
- respondent
Rukunuddin G. Sheikh
- respondent
Rukunuddin G. Sheikh & Ors.
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court