Kowshik Rahja Muthuchezhiyan v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Order calling respondent Bank to file counter-affidavit and appellant to file proof of substituted service for unserved beneficiaries. No substantive decision recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
01/07/2022
Appellant’s counsel present. Proof of service filed for R-1 to R-38. R-1, to R-4, R-6, R-7, R-10 to R-14, R-16, R-23 to R-25, R-29, R-30, R-32 to R-34 & R-37 served. R-5, R-8, R-9, R-15, R-17, R-26, R-27 Returned as “Refused”. R-5, R- 8, R-9, R-15, R-17, R-26, R-27 deemed to be served. R-18, R-19, R-31, R-35, R-36 & R-38. Returned as “No such addressee”. R-20 to R-22 Returned as “Insufficient Address”. R-28 Returned as “Unclaimed”.
Ld. Counsel M/s. Ananda Gomathy Murugesan filed vakalat for R-1 Bank and prays time for filing counter in IA 193/2022 (Waiver).
Call on 29/7/2022 for filing Affidavit of substituted service of R-18, R-19, R-20 to R- 22, R-28, R-31, R-35, R-36 & R-38 by Appellant and counter of R-1 Bank.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Appellant
- respondent
Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090000822022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court