Disposed
Kowshik Rahja Muthuchezhiyan v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single line order dismissing an application for substituted service due to non-filing of necessary affidavits; no final decision on merits.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
IA 193/2022 in A.IR: 82/2022
¶3
R.Muthuchezhian V/S Union Bank Of India & Ors
¶4
15/09/2022
¶5
None for Appellant.
¶6
Respondent Counsel present.
¶7
Affidavit of substituted service not filed yet by Appellant.
¶8
Counsel for R1 Bank not filed counter despite considerable time given.
¶9
Call on 22/09/2022 for Affidavit of substituted service and counter by R1 as last chance.
¶10
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
R.Muthuchezhian
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090000822022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court