T Karikalan v. Karur Vysya Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai declined an appeal (A.IR:293/2022) due to non-compliance with office objections under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was declined terms of Rule 6(4) of DRAT Procedure Rules 1994.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:293/2022
T.Karikalan V/S Karur Vysya Bank Ltd
29/11/2022
None for Appellant.
Office objections not complied yet.
Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT( Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/-
Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T. Karikalan
- respondent
Karur Vysya Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · November
- CNR
- 331090002932022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court