In an interim application filed to allow further time for the substitution of the appellant bank, the court rejected the request for an extension and directed compliance within three weeks.
No further time granted; steps to be completed within three weeks; matter posted for next steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 753/2015 (CoD)
In M.A. No. 500/2015 (Restoration) In
Appeal No. 62/2006- Disposed of) Between
Dena Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
Shri Naushad Tafiqu Khan …Respondent/s
Mr. Vdaya Kumar S Nadar, i/b M/s. Anup Khaitan & Co., Advocate for the Appellant.
-: Order dated: 26/09/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Applicant/Appellant seeks
further time for substitution of the Appellant Bank.
Steps shall be completed within three weeks.
No further time will be granted.
Post on 31.10.2022 for steps.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-19
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether further time should be granted for substitution of the appellant bank in an appeal.
Dena Bank
Shri Naushad Tafiqu Khan
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
