In Misc Appeal No. 116/2022, the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned the matter to 03.11.2022 on a counsel's prayer for more time. The court noted a possibility of settlement and directed filing of reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc Appeal No. 116/2022
Between
The Sangli District Co. Op Bank Ltd.
… Appellant/s
V/s.
M/s. Mahankali Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and …Respondent/s Ors.
Mr Harjot Singh, along with Mr Rishabh Shah, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellant.
Mr Rupak Sawangikar, i/b M/s. V. Deshpande & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
Mr Rajesh Nagori, i/b Ms Sanjana Ghogare, Advocate for the Respondent No. 3.
-: Order dated: 19/10/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents seeks further time for filing a reply.
It is also stated that there is a fair possibility of a settlement.
Post on 03.11.2022 for filing reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-08
The Sangli District Co. Op Bank Ltd.
M/s. Mahankali Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.
Respondent No. 3
Ashok Menon
Chairperson
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal
Mumbai
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
