Court allowed interim applications for substituted service against legal heirs of the second Respondent and directed proof of affidavit production before Registrar.
I.A. Nos. 466/2022 and 467/2022 allowed; substituted service to be effected against proposed legal heirs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 466/2022 (Publication For Lrs)
And I.A. No. 467/2022 (Publication For CoD)
In Appeal No. 156/2013
Between
Bank of Baroda
… Appellant/s
V/s.
Mr. Ravindrakumar Chhaganlal Baid & Ors. …Respondent/s Mr. Anant B. Shinde, Advocate for the Appellant. Ms. Sonali Jain, Advocate for Respondent No. 1 & 3.
-: Order dated: 19/10/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe dated 13.10.2022 filed by Appellants for seeking urgent relief.
I.A. No. 466/2022 is allowed and substituted service shall be effected against proposed legal heirs of the second Respondent.
I.A. No. 467/2022 is also allowed and substitution service shall be effected.
Produce proof Affidavit, post on 22.12.2022 before Registrar for completing service in M.A. No. 365/2018.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-18
Bank of Baroda
Mr. Ravindrakumar Chhaganlal Baid
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
