Application to substitute Respondent No. 3, Corporation Bank, with Union Bank of India allowed as a formal amendment.
Substitution of Respondent No. 3, Corporation Bank, with Union Bank of India allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 413/2022 (Amendment)
In
Appeal No. 39/2012
Between
Bank of Baroda … Appellant/s V/s. Sterlite Industries India Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s Ms. Sophie M., Advocate for Appellant. Mr. D. Shah, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr. P. Farnandis, Advocate for Respondent No.2
-: Order dated: 07/11/2022:-
I.A. No. 413/2022 which is an application for substitution of the Respondent No. 31 Corporation Bank is being substituted with the Union Bank of India being a formal objection there is no reply filed to this application being a formal amendment.
The application is allowed. The amendment shall be carried out within two weeks.
Post on 01.12.2022 for hearing before the Registrar.
Sd/Chairperson
psa-14
1
Bank of Baroda
Sterlite Industries India Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
