The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Mumbai granted the appellant two weeks to file a reply to an application by an intervenor seeking to be impleaded in Misc. Appeal No. 30/2022.
Two weeks time granted to file reply to intervenor's application for impleadment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 30/2022
Between
M/s. Abhay Industries & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank …Respondent/s
Mr Arun Kumar, Advocate for Appellants. Mr Gajendra A. Rajput, Advocate for Respondent Bank. Mr Niket Harit, Advocate for Intervener.
-: Order dated: 30/09/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellants seeks two weeks’ time to file a reply on I.A. No. 270/2022 which is filed by Intervener to get impleaded.
The reply shall be filed within two weeks positively. No further adjournment will be granted and the application shall be posted for hearing on 16.11.2022.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1
M/s. Abhay Industries & Anr.
The Authorised Officer, Canara Bank
Intervener
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
