The Appeals Tribunal dismissed an appeal for default due to the non-appearance of the appellant despite specific directions to be present.
An appeal was dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 78/2019
Between
Authorized Officer and Chief Manager, Dena … Appellant/s Bank (Now Bank of Baroda) V/s. Vinod S/o Narrotam Singh Verma & Anr. …Respondent/s
Vinod S/o Narrotam Singh Verma & Anr.
-: Order dated: 30/09/2022:-
There has been no appearance of the Appellant despite the matter being adjourned from time to time. On 30.06.2022 specific direction was given to the Appellant to get ready for the hearing. Today, also there was no representation.
Hence, I assume that the Appellant is not keen on proceeding with the Appeal.
Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-18
1
Authorized Officer and Chief Manager, Dena ... Bank (Now Bank of Baroda)
Vinod S/o Narrotam Singh Verma & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
