The Tribunal allowed the interim application for substituted service, found the respondents absent, set them ex parte, and posted the matter for ex parte hearing.
Application for substituted service withdrawn; respondents set as absent and heard ex parte.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 107/2020 (Substituted Service)
In
Appeal No. 35/2019
Between
Punjab National Bank … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India & Ors. … Respondent/s
Mr. Aditya Pawar, i/b M/s. Bhuta & Associates, Advocate for Appellants.
-: Order dated: 27/07/2022:-
I.A. No. 107/2020 i.e. application for substituted service through the publication of notice in the newspapers is withdrawn as the newspaper publication is already produced by the Appellant.
Respondents have been served but none appears, hence the Respondents are called absent and set ex-parte.
Post on 23.09.2022 for ex-parte hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-5
1
Punjab National Bank
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
