Dilip Sarkar v. Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal noted defects in an application under Section 18 of S.REFARSI Act, 2002, including missing certified copies and non-payment of pre-deposit, directing the appellant to cure defects. The matter was subsequently posted earlier by the appellant's absence.
What did the court decide?
Application to be disposed of subject to removal of defects within 15 days.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.391/2019, Date:22/03/2022
Dilip Sarkar…………Appellant
Vs.
Bank of India.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 18 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Biswajit Nag.
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of D. Sarkar against the order dt.04.11.2019 in SA/458/2018 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-III, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.6755/- vide T.R. no.114150 dt. 28.11.2019 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Biswajit Nag.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is well within the period of Limitation.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dilip Sarkar
- respondent
Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090003912019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court