Chaudhary Neeraj Kumar and 3 Ors. v. Punjab National Bank and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order allowing substitution of parties due to the death of the appellant and listing the case for reply.
What did the court decide?
Substitution application allowed; substitution to be made in memo of appeal by the next date.
What the court decided
I.A. No. 230/2022 In Appeal Dy. No. 14/2022 Date: 25.07.2022
Ram Naresh Chaudhari Vs. Punjab National Bank
Present: Shri Aman Kumar Srivastava, counsel for the appellant, Shri A. K. Pal, Advocate holding brief of Shri Sanjai Singh, counsel for the respondent-Bank,
Learned counsel for the appellant contends that the appellant had expired on 23.03.2022, for which he has filed the substitution application being I.A. No. 230/2022. Hence, the same may be allowed.
Accordingly, the substitution application filed by the appellant is allowed. Let the substitution be made in the array of party of memo of appeal by the next date.
Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank seeks time to file reply. Let the same be filed by the next date.
List this case on 11.10.2022 for reply.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
Anupam
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ram Naresh Chaudhari
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Coram
R. D. Khare
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court