Beauty Ghosh v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellants filed an appeal application under Section 20 of the RDDBFI Act against an order of DRT-1, Kolkata. The Tribunal noted defects including unsigned annexures, missing certified copy, deficiency in court fees, non-compliance of pre-deposit, and non-enclosure of the impugned order.
What did the court decide?
Application to fix defects and next date fixed for Appearance and removal of defects.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
DY. no.82/2022 Date: 12/04/2022
Beauty Ghosh & Anr ...………...Appellants
Vs.
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd..... .……….Respondent
Received an application under section 20 of Recovery of Debts Due to Bankruptcy Act,1993, presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukhopadhyay .
Scrutiny of the application observed the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Beauty Ghosh & Anr against the order passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-1, Kolkata order dated 09-12-2021 in OA/06/2019. Application fees of Rs.255/- vide T.R. no.115556 dt.07-04-2022 has been paid along with the application.
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is well within the period of Limitation.
The following defects are noted from the Application:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appeal application suffers from defects requiring correction before hearing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Beauty Ghosh & Anr
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090000822022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court