Angshuman Mukherjee v. Authorised Officer, Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The DARAT at Kolkata refused to register the petition due to the long-standing non-appearance of both parties. No substantive argument or decision on the merits was recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary No. 252/2017, Date. 13/07/2022
AngshumanMukherjee ……………… Applicant
V/s.
The Authorised Officer Union Bank of India …………. Respondent
None appears for both Appellant and Respondent since long.
The matter will not be registered due to non-appearance since long.
REGISTRAR
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Angshuman Mukherjee
- respondent
The Authorised Officer Union Bank of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court