Aman Saraogi v. Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal noted that an appeal under Section 20 RDBBA was filed beyond the limitation period and contained defective annexures. The appellant was directed to remove defects within 15 days.
What did the court decide?
Direction to remove defects and file delay petition within 15 days to save the application from rejection.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.217/2017; Dt.:08.04.2022
Aman Sarogi.………...Appellant
Vs.
Punjab National Bank.……….Respondents
Received an application under section 20 of Recovery of Debts due to Banks and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 presented by Ld. Advocate, Mr. Yash Vardhan Deora .
Scrutiny of the application reveals the followings:
The application has been filed on behalf of Aman Sarogi against the order dt.19.07.2017 in OA/347/2016 passed by the Ld. Presiding Officer, DRT-3, Kolkata. Application fees of Rs.255/- vide T.R. no.110936 dt. 01.09.2017 has been paid along with the application.
The Vakalatnama has been filed by the Ld. Advocate, Mr. Yash Vardhan Deora .
The case is under the jurisdiction of this Appellate Tribunal.
The Application is not within the period of Limitation.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application under section 20 RDBBA is maintainable when filed beyond the period of limitation?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aman Sarogi
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · April
- CNR
- 191090002172017
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court