Aftab Alam and others v. Uco Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
This order lists an appeal for hearing on a specified future date after noting that some respondents intend not to file replies.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Appeal Dy. No. 245/2020 Date: 17.10.2022
Aftab Alam and Ors. Vs. UCO Bank & Ors.
Present: Shri Shresth Pandey, counsel for the appellant, Shri Himanshu Tiwari, counsel for the respondent-Bank, Shri Rakesh Mishra, counsel for the respondent no. 4, Shri Ashok Pandey, counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 submits that his client has not given vakalatnama and he is not responding.
Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 3 does not want to file reply.
Reply of the respondent-Bank has already been filed, to which rejoinder has also been filed.
List this case on 12.01.2023 for hearing.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aftab Alam and Ors.
- respondent
UCO Bank
- respondent
Respondent no. 2
- respondent
Respondent no. 3
- respondent
Respondent no. 4
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · October
- CNR
- 091090002452020
- Bench
- Rajesh Dayal Khare
All orders in this case
6 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court