Disposed¶33

Anwar Khan v. Hazi Mohd.Shamshad

Delhi HC22 Jan 2026RFA/941/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anwar Khan RFA disposal Delhi High Court; mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025; Section 151 CPC; release of deposit Rs. 95,927/- with Registrar; respondents Hazi Mohd. Shamshad & Anr., Mohd. Irshad, Aslam Pervez; Justice Neena Bansal Krishna; order dated 22.01.2026; appeals disposed of with pending applications.

What did the court decide?

Directed release to the Appellant of the amount(s) of Rs. 95,927/- deposited with the Registrar, the Appellant to pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff; Appeals disposed of along with pending Applications in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025. ¶33

Anwar Khan Vs Hazi Mohd.Shamshad — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~20 to 26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 247/2023, CM APPL. 14790-14792/2023 ANWAR KHAN

¶4

.....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus HAZI MOHD. SHAMSHAD & ANR. & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates. 21 + RFA 823/2023, CM APPL. 51901-51903/2023 ANWAR KHAN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus MOHD. IRSHAD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates. 22 + RFA 839/2023, CM APPL. 53357-53359/2023 ANWAR KHAN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus MOHD IRSHAD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman

¶5

This is a digitally signed order.

¶6

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:56:30

¶7

Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶8

23
+	RFA 867/2023, CM APPL. 55049-55050/2023
	ANWAR KHAN

¶9

					.....Appellant
		Through:	Ms. Archana Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Gaur Mr.	CGSC, Ms. Deepu Kumar,
	ASLAM PERVEZ	versus			.....Respondent
		Through:	Ms. Aakanksha	Kau	l, Mr. Aman
			Sahani, Ms. A	shima	Chopra, Mr.
			Saptarshi Sarmah	, Adv	ocates.
24
+	RFA 902/2023, CM ANWAR KHAN	APPL. 58	186-58188/2023
					.....Appellant
		Through:	Ms. Archana	Gaur	CGSC, Ms.
			Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Mr.	Deepu Kumar,
	ASLAM PERVEZ	versus			.....Respondent
		Through:	Ms. Aakanksha	Kau	l, Mr. Aman
			Sahani, Ms. A	shima	Chopra, Mr.
			Saptarshi Sarmah	, Adv	ocates.
25
+	RFA 927/2023, CM ANWAR KHAN	APPL. 60	060-60062/2023		.....Appellant
	ASLAM PERVEZ	Through: versus	Ms. Archana Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Gaur Mr.	CGSC, Ms. Deepu Kumar, .....Respondent

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:56:30

¶12

Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶13

¶14

- RFA 941/2023, CM APPL. 61270-61272/2023 ANWAR KHAN

¶15

.....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus

¶16

HAZI MOHD.SHAMSHAD

¶17

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶18

CORAM:

¶19

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 22.01.2026

¶20

RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA 902/2023, RFA 927/2023 and RFA 941/2023

¶21

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the above matters have been duly settled between the parties in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025 and the Appeals be disposed of.

¶22

Learned counsel for the Respondents endorses that the matters have been amicably settled with the Appellant voluntarily without any pressure, force and coercion in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025. he has No Objection to the disposal of the above Appeals in terms of the Settlement.

¶23

CM APPL. 4332/2026 In RFA 247/2023, CM APPL. 4333/2026 In RFA 823/2023, CM APPL. 3246/2026 In RFA 839/2023, CM APPL. 3249/2026 In RFA 867/2023, CM APPL. 4335/2026 In RFA 902/2023,

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:56:30

¶25

CM APPL. 4334/2026 In RFA 927/2023 and CM APPL. 4340/2026 In RFA 941/2023 ( under Section 151 CPC on behalf of Appellant for Release of the Amount of Rs.95,927/- deposited with Registrar )

¶26

The above Applications have been filed on behalf of the Appellant for

¶27

release of Rs.95,927/- deposited by the Appellant in terms of the Order dated 11.04.2023, 11.10.2023, 12.10.2023, 20.10.2023, 03.11.2025, 21.11.2023 and 28.11.2023 respectively, to the Appellant who shall pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff.

¶28

Learned counsel for the Respondent/Plaintiff has No Objection if the deposited amounts in the Court are released in favour of the Appellant.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid, the amounts deposited, be released to the Appellant in compliance of the terms of the Settlement dated 27.11.2025.

¶30

The Applications are disposed of accordingly.

¶31

RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA

¶32

902/2023, RFA 927/2023 and RFA 941/2023

¶33

In view of the above, the above Appeals are disposed of along with the pending Applications.

¶34

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

¶35

JANUARY 22, 2026/ va

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:56:30

Anwar Khan v. Hazi Mohd.Shamshad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Khan v. Hazi Mohd.Shamshad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namo Narayan Jha Vs Tarannum

Rahul Sharma Vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kap Cones Pvt. Ltd.

Anwar Khan Vs Mohd. Irshad

Surinder Kumar Vaid & Ors. Vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

Rajiv & Anr. Vs Kiran Bala & Ors.