Anwar Khan v. Mohd. Irshad

Delhi HC22 Jan 2026RFA/823/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Batch disposal of seven Delhi High Court Regular First Appeals (RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA 902/2023, RFA 927/2023, RFA 941/2023) — Anwar Khan v. Hazi Mohd. Shamshad / Mohd. Irshad / Aslam Pervez — appeals disposed of in terms of mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025; applications under Section 151 CPC allowed and Rs. 95,927/- deposited with the Registrar released to the Appellant for payment to the Respondent/Plaintiff as per the Settlement; consensual disposal without merits adjudication; coram: Neena Bansal Krishna, J.; decision date 22.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Appeals and pending applications disposed of in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025; deposited amount of Rs. 95,927/- directed to be released to the Appellant, who is to pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff.

Anwar Khan Vs Mohd. Irshad — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶¶33

Issue for consideration

Whether the Appeals should be disposed of in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025 arrived at between the parties. +1 more

¶¶21

Court's answer

The Appeals are disposed of, along with the pending Applications, the parties having settled the matters in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025.

¶¶33

Ratio / Principle

The amounts deposited in Court are to be released to the Appellant, who shall pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff, in compliance of the terms of the Settlement dated 27.11.2025.

¶¶29

Key takeaways

The Applications under Section 151 CPC seeking release of the deposited amount are disposed of accordingly.ratio¶¶30

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Delhi High Court (Neena Bansal Krishna, J.), Order dated 22.01.2026 — Seven Regular First Appeals, RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA 902/2023, RFA 927/2023 and RFA 941/2023, filed by Anwar Khan against Hazi Mohd. Shamshad, Mohd. Irshad and Aslam Pervez, disposed of on the basis of settlement: learned counsel for the Appellant stated that the matters had been duly settled between the parties in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025, and counsel for the Respondents endorsed that the settlement was arrived at voluntarily, without any pressure, force or coercion, and had no objection to disposal of the Appeals in terms of the Settlement. Applications under Section 151 CPC filed on behalf of the Appellant for release of Rs. 95,927/- deposited with the Registrar in terms of orders dated 11.04.2023, 11.10.2023, 12.10.2023, 20.10.2023, 03.11.2025, 21.11.2023 and 28.11.2023 were allowed, counsel for the Respondent/Plaintiff having no objection; the deposited amounts were directed to be released to the Appellant, who is to pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff. Appeals disposed of along with pending applications. No adjudication on merits; no precedent cited.

¶1

$~20 to 26

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RFA 247/2023, CM APPL. 14790-14792/2023 ANWAR KHAN

¶4

.....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus HAZI MOHD. SHAMSHAD & ANR. & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates. 21 + RFA 823/2023, CM APPL. 51901-51903/2023 ANWAR KHAN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus MOHD. IRSHAD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates. 22 + RFA 839/2023, CM APPL. 53357-53359/2023 ANWAR KHAN .....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus MOHD IRSHAD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman

¶5

This is a digitally signed order.

¶6

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:57:26

¶7

Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶8

23
+	RFA 867/2023, CM APPL. 55049-55050/2023
	ANWAR KHAN

¶9

					.....Appellant
		Through:	Ms. Archana Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Gaur Mr.	CGSC, Ms. Deepu Kumar,
	ASLAM PERVEZ	versus			.....Respondent
		Through:	Ms. Aakanksha	Kau	l, Mr. Aman
			Sahani, Ms. A	shima	Chopra, Mr.
			Saptarshi Sarmah	, Adv	ocates.
24
+	RFA 902/2023, CM ANWAR KHAN	APPL. 58	186-58188/2023
					.....Appellant
		Through:	Ms. Archana	Gaur	CGSC, Ms.
			Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Mr.	Deepu Kumar,
	ASLAM PERVEZ	versus			.....Respondent
		Through:	Ms. Aakanksha	Kau	l, Mr. Aman
			Sahani, Ms. A	shima	Chopra, Mr.
			Saptarshi Sarmah	, Adv	ocates.
25
+	RFA 927/2023, CM ANWAR KHAN	APPL. 60	060-60062/2023		.....Appellant
	ASLAM PERVEZ	Through: versus	Ms. Archana Riddhima Gaur, Advocates.	Gaur Mr.	CGSC, Ms. Deepu Kumar, .....Respondent

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:57:26

¶12

Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶13

¶14

- RFA 941/2023, CM APPL. 61270-61272/2023 ANWAR KHAN

¶15

.....Appellant Through: Ms. Archana Gaur CGSC, Ms. Riddhima Gaur, Mr. Deepu Kumar, Advocates. versus

¶16

HAZI MOHD.SHAMSHAD

¶17

.....Respondent Through: Ms. Aakanksha Kaul, Mr. Aman Sahani, Ms. Ashima Chopra, Mr. Saptarshi Sarmah, Advocates.

¶18

CORAM:

¶19

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA O R D E R % 22.01.2026

¶20

RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA 902/2023, RFA 927/2023 and RFA 941/2023

¶21

Learned counsel for the Appellant submits that the above matters have been duly settled between the parties in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025 and the Appeals be disposed of.

¶22

Learned counsel for the Respondents endorses that the matters have been amicably settled with the Appellant voluntarily without any pressure, force and coercion in terms of the mediated Settlement dated 27.11.2025. he has No Objection to the disposal of the above Appeals in terms of the Settlement.

¶23

CM APPL. 4332/2026 In RFA 247/2023, CM APPL. 4333/2026 In RFA 823/2023, CM APPL. 3246/2026 In RFA 839/2023, CM APPL. 3249/2026 In RFA 867/2023, CM APPL. 4335/2026 In RFA 902/2023,

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:57:26

¶25

CM APPL. 4334/2026 In RFA 927/2023 and CM APPL. 4340/2026 In RFA 941/2023 ( under Section 151 CPC on behalf of Appellant for Release of the Amount of Rs.95,927/- deposited with Registrar )

¶26

The above Applications have been filed on behalf of the Appellant for

¶27

release of Rs.95,927/- deposited by the Appellant in terms of the Order dated 11.04.2023, 11.10.2023, 12.10.2023, 20.10.2023, 03.11.2025, 21.11.2023 and 28.11.2023 respectively, to the Appellant who shall pay the amount as agreed in the Settlement to the Respondent/Plaintiff.

¶28

Learned counsel for the Respondent/Plaintiff has No Objection if the deposited amounts in the Court are released in favour of the Appellant.

¶29

In view of the aforesaid, the amounts deposited, be released to the Appellant in compliance of the terms of the Settlement dated 27.11.2025.

¶30

The Applications are disposed of accordingly.

¶31

RFA 247/2023, RFA 823/2023, RFA 839/2023, RFA 867/2023, RFA

¶32

902/2023, RFA 927/2023 and RFA 941/2023

¶33

In view of the above, the above Appeals are disposed of along with the pending Applications.

¶34

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

¶35

JANUARY 22, 2026/ va

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 12:57:26

Anwar Khan v. Mohd. Irshad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anwar Khan v. Mohd. Irshad

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Namo Narayan Jha Vs Tarannum

Rahul Sharma Vs Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr.

Nirulas Corner House Pvt. Ltd. Vs Kap Cones Pvt. Ltd.

Surinder Kumar Vaid & Ors. Vs Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

Rajiv & Anr. Vs Kiran Bala & Ors.

Harveer Giri Vs M/S Bharat Sandhu Samaj Society