Raj Kumar v. Nirmal Singh
Case brief
What is this about?
RFA 34/2010 | Raj Kumar v. Nirmal Singh | High Court of Delhi | Section 96 CPC | appeal dismissed in default for non-prosecution | appellant absent on 21.04.2025 and 08.10.2025 | notice vide order 10.12.2024 | Judgment and Decree 17.11.2009 | specific performance of agreement to sell-cum-receipt 09.12.2005 | earnest/advance money Rs. 2,40,000/- | double Rs. 4,80,000/- | interest 18% per annum from 11.01.2006 | Amit Sharma, J | decision date 10.02.2026 | pending applications disposed of | no cases cited | appellant Through: None | respondent advocate Amardeep Maini.
What did the court decide?
The present appeal is dismissed in default for non-prosecution and disposed of accordingly, the appellant having made no appearance on 21.04.2025 despite service, and again none on the last hearing date of 08.10.2025. ¶¶20