Dismissed¶18

Ms Des Raj Jewellers v. Sh Mukesh Khanna

Delhi HC4 Feb 2026RC.REV./40/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

RC.REV. 40/2026; CM APPL. 7775-76/2026; High Court of Delhi; Amit Sharma J.; Section 25B(8) Delhi Rent Control Act; leave to defend application; petition withdrawn; dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of; Des Raj Jewellers petitioner; Mukesh Khanna respondent; E.391/2019; order dated 23.10.2020; ACJ-cum-ARC Shefali Barnala Tandon; Tis Hazari Courts; rent control revision withdrawal; no substantive ruling on merits.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of; pending applications disposed of. No relief against the impugned order of 23.10.2020. ¶18

Ms Des Raj Jewellers Vs Sh Mukesh Khanna — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~79

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 40/2026 & CM APPL. 7775-76/2026

¶4

MS DES RAJ JEWELLERS .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Praveen Suri, Advocate (through VC).

¶6

versus

¶7

SH MUKESH KHANNA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Chandrika Gupta and Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocates.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R % 04.02.2026

¶11

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Section 25B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act

¶13

seeks following prayers:-

¶14

i) To call for the records of the case bearing no. E.391/2019, titled as Shri Mukesh Khanna vs Des Raj Jewellers passed by the Court of Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon, the then ACJ-cum-ARC, District: Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. ii) To set aside the order and judgment dated 23.10.2020 passed in E.391/2019, titled as Shri Mukesh Khanna vs Des Raj Jewellers by the Court of Ms. Shefali Barnala Tandon, the then ACJ-cum-ARC, District: Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi and grant leave to defend in favour of the petitioner-firm. iii) Cost of the present proceedings be awarded in favour of the petitioner -firm and against the respondent.

¶15

iv) Any other order / relief as may be deemed fit and property may also be passed in favour of the Petitioner-firm and against the Respondent.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.

¶17

Leave granted.

¶18

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of

¶19

This is a digitally signed order.

¶20

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 12:37:38

¶21

accordingly.

¶22

Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

¶23

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶24

FEBRUARY 04, 2026 /sn/sg

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 12:37:38

Ms Des Raj Jewellers v. Sh Mukesh Khanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ms Des Raj Jewellers v. Sh Mukesh Khanna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Himanshu Verma Vs Chandni Verma

Satish Chand Vs Atul Gupta Alias Atul Aggarwal & Anr.

Indian Ex Bordermen Movement through Jatinder Paul Syal Vs Ajay Kumar Bhalla

Zulfiquar Ahmed Vs Mohd Azam Khan

M/S Jai Baba Nanak Cloth Trading Co. Vs M/S Aviva Trading Co. and Anothers

Naranjan Singh & Ors. Vs Yogendra Tripathi & Anr.