Satish Chand v. Atul Gupta Alias Atul Aggarwal & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi HC, Justice Amit Sharma, 03.02.2026. RC.REV. 111/2025 (CM APPL. 18654/2025, 62594/2025) and RC.REV. 113/2025 (CM APPL. 18809/2025, 62404/2025) under S.25-B(8) Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 challenging eviction orders/judgments dated 11.07.2024 in E-311/2013 (E-78371/2016) and E-312/2013 (E-77543/2016) under S.14(1)(e) read with S.25(B). Petitioners: Satish Chand; Subhash Chand Jain & Anr. (counsel Namit Suri, Surabhi Sinha). Respondent: Atul Gupta alias/@ Atul Aggarwal (& Anr.) (counsel Ajit Rajput, respondent in person). Outcome: disposed of as not pressed; premises vacated, keys handed over; composite Rs.1,50,000/- agreed payable within three weeks; pending applications disposed. Keywords: revision petition, eviction, not pressed, user and occupation charges, vacation of premises, settlement.
What did the court decide?
None in judicial terms; petitions disposed of as not pressed after the premises were vacated and keys handed over, with an agreed composite payment of Rs.1,50,000/- to the respondent.