Dismissed¶22

Sudesh Kumar through Legal Representative Smt.Neelam Prabha and Anr. v. Mahesh Chand and Sons (Huf) through Its Karta Sh. Sharad Aggarwal

Delhi HC12 Feb 2026RC.REV./302/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sudesh Kumar (thr. LR Smt. Neelam Prabha) v. Mahesh Chand and Sons (HUF) thr. Karta Sharad Aggarwal; RC.REV. 302/2024 & CM APPL. 63217/2024; High Court of Delhi; Justice Amit Sharma; 12.02.2026; petition under Section 25-B(8) Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 against judgment dated 31.05.2024 of SCJ-cum-RC Tis Hazari (RC ARC No. 78081 of 2016); possession already taken by respondent; withdrawal permitted; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to respondent for recovery of arrears.

What did the court decide?

Leave granted to withdraw the petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly, with liberty reserved to the respondent to take appropriate steps for recovery of arrears, if any. ¶22

Sudesh Kumar through Legal Representative Smt.Neelam Prabha and Anr. Vs Mahesh Chand and Sons (Huf) through Its Karta Sh. Sharad Aggarwal — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~9

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- RC.REV. 302/2024 & CM APPL. 63217/2024

¶4

SUDESH KUMAR THROUGH LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE SMT.NEELAM PRABHA AND ANR .....Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr. Bhavnesh Mittal, Adv. (through VC).

¶6

versus

¶7

MAHESH CHAND AND SONS (HUF) THROUGH ITS KARTA SH. SHARAD AGGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ravinder Kumar, Mr. Gaurav Garg, Mr. Vipul Govil & Mr. Govind Kashyap, Advs. Mr. Vikrant Arora, Adv.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 12.02.2026 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶12

The present petition under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control

¶13

Act, 1958 seeks the following prayers:-

¶14

“ A. Admit and allow the present Appeal and set aside the Impugned Judgment dated 31.05.2024 passed by the court of Sh . Harjeet Singh Jaspal, SCJ-CUM-RC, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in the matter of Mahesh Chand & Sons (HUF) v. Sb. Sudesh Kumar & Sh. Joginder (Since deceased) Th. his LR Smt Neelam Prabha, bearing RC ARC No.78081 of2016;

¶15

B. Award cost of the proceedings in favour of the Petitioners and against the Respondent; and

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:01:15

¶18

C. such other and further order(s) / direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of this case.”

¶19

It is pointed out that possession of the subject premises has already been taken by the respondent.

¶20

In view of the same, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present petition.

¶21

Leave granted.

¶22

The present petition is dismissed as withdrawn and disposed of accordingly.

¶23

Needless to say, the respondent will be at liberty to take appropriate steps with respect to recovery of arrears, if any.

¶24

AMIT SHARMA, J

¶25

FEBRUARY 12, 2026/nk/db

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 13:01:15

Sudesh Kumar through Legal Representative Smt.Neelam Prabha and Anr. v. Mahesh Chand and Sons (Huf) through Its Karta Sh. Sharad Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sudesh Kumar through Legal Representative Smt.Neelam Prabha and Anr. v. Mahesh Chand and Sons (Huf) through Its Karta Sh. Sharad Aggarwal

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Chadha Vs Gurpreet Kaur

Sh. Nitin Chopra Vs Smt. Geeta Chopra

Mohd Zaki Vs Mohd Saim & Ors.

Sarphina Vs Mukesh Kumar Gupta

Hair Master Salon Vs Tilak Raj Lamba & Anr.

Hair Master Salon Pvt. Ltd. Vs Tilak Raj Lamba & Anr.