Subhash Chand Jain & Anr. v. Atul Gupta @ Atul Aggarwal
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court; Justice Amit Sharma; 03.02.2026; RC.REV. 111/2025 & RC.REV. 113/2025; Section 25-B(8) Delhi Rent Control Act 1958 revision against eviction order/judgment dated 11.07.2024 under Section 14(1)(e) read with Section 25(B) DRC Act (Eviction Petition E-311/2013 renumbered E-78371/2016; E-312/2013 renumbered E-77543/2016); tenants Satish Chand and Subhash Chand Jain & Anr.; landlord Atul Gupta alias/@ Atul Aggarwal; settlement during pendency; vacation of premises and handover of keys; use and occupation charges; composite amount Rs.1,50,000/- payable within three weeks; petitions disposed of as not pressed; pending applications disposed of; no holding, no ratio.
What did the court decide?
No substantive relief adjudicated. Both petitions disposed of as not pressed following settlement: tenant vacated the subject premises and handed over keys to the respondent, and agreed to pay a composite amount of Rs.1,50,000/- towards use and occupation charges for both petitions within three weeks. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.