Dismissed¶16

Mr Ishan Singh v. Spaze Towers Private Limited

Delhi HC6 May 2026OMP (ENF.) (COMM.)/26/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of execution petition under Section 36 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 r/w Order XXI Rule 32 CPC (OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 26/2023, Ishan Singh v. Spaze Towers Private Limited) seeking execution of arbitral award dated 14.09.2022; decree holder pursuing NCLAT remedy in Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1107 of 2025; petition and pending applications dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to pursue available remedies.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn, with leave and liberty to pursue such remedies as may be available in accordance with law. ¶16

Mr Ishan Singh Vs Spaze Towers Private Limited — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 26/2023, CRL.M.A. 4509/2025 (Filed by decree holder U/S 215 R/W 379), EX.APPL.(OS) 120/2023 (Dir.), EX.APPL.(OS) 835/2024 (Dir.), EX.APPL.(OS) 1403/2024 (Filed on behalf of the decree holder seeking closure of the JD right to file reply to the application 835/2024), EX.APPL.(OS) 1549/2024 (Seeking vacation of Para 3 of the order dt. 09.09.2024) & EX.APPL.(OS) 1596/2024 (U/O 1 Rule 10)

¶4

MR ISHAN SINGH .....Decree Holder Through: Mr. Guneet Singh Sidhu and Mr. Siddharth Chittal, Advocates. versus

¶5

SPAZE TOWERS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Judgement Debtor Through: Mr. Karan Gandhi, Advocate through Video Conferencing. Mr. Ankit Banati and Ms. Divya Narang, Advocates for Allotees and Impleaders.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR

¶8

O R D E R % 06.05.2026

¶9

The present Petition has been instituted under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, read with Order XXI Rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking execution of the Arbitral Award dated 14.09.2022.

¶10

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Decree Holder submits that the present proceedings do not survive in view of the Decree Holder having invoked its remedies before the learned

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 12:38:31

¶13

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) by way of Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) No. 1107 of 2025.

¶14

He accordingly seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the present Petition, with liberty to pursue such remedies as may be available to him in accordance with law.

¶15

Leave and liberty, as sought for, are granted.

¶16

Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, stands dismissed as withdrawn.

¶17

HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. MAY 06, 2026/nd/kr/ma

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/05/2026 at 12:38:31

Mr Ishan Singh v. Spaze Towers Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mr Ishan Singh v. Spaze Towers Private Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S. Bscpl Infrastructure Ltd. Vs National Highway Authority of India

Pradeep Mehta Vs the Batukji Co-Operative Group Housing Society Ltd.

Director General of Married Accommodation Projects (Dgmap) Vs Rds Project Limited

Planetcast Media Services Limited Vs Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi (Gnctd) & Anr.

360 Degrees Management Services Private Limited Vs Suman S Srinivasan & Ors.

Mr. Pradeep Dass Vs Splendor Landbase Limited & Ors.