Petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time to conclude arbitration proceedings. The respondent raised no serious objection, and the court extended the period by four months from 16.04.2026 as prayed for.
Time for concluding arbitration proceedings extended by four months w.e.f. 16.04.2026.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
SURESH DHANUKA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ganesh A Khemka, Mr. Shreenath A Khemka, Ms. Vidhi Gupta & Mr. Sarthak Sharma, Advs.
versus
SHAHNAZ HUSAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Chetan Sinha, Adv.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
MAY 15, 2026 Ch
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:06:11
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SURESH DHANUKA
SHAHNAZ HUSAIN
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
