Petition under Section 29A seeking extension of the period for concluding arbitration proceedings; respondent raised no serious objection, and the court extended the period by three months as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
AFC INDIA LTD .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anurag Lakhotia and Ms. Gunjan Kumar, Advs.
versus
MOUNT TALENT CONSULTING PVT. LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. K.V. Balakrishnan, Adv. (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
O R D E R
% 14.05.2026
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
MAY 14, 2026 ‘ha’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 12:06:31
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
AFC INDIA LTD
MOUNT TALENT CONSULTING PVT. LTD
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
