Disposed¶25

Dee Vee Projects Ltd. v. Ms Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Ltd.

Delhi HC7 Jan 2026O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.)/17/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Section 29A Arbitration & Conciliation Act 1996; extension of mandate of Arbitral Tribunal by one month; Dee Vee Projects Ltd v. MS Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Ltd; Sole Arbitrator Justice (Retd.) Krishna Murari appointed 04.08.2023 (ARB.P.614/2023); earlier extensions till 24.07.2024 and 31.12.2025 (order dated 21.07.2025); proceedings at final hearing stage; no objection by respondent; Delhi High Court O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 17/2026; order dated 07.01.2026; petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Extension of the time period for conclusion of the arbitration proceedings by one month. ¶25

Dee Vee Projects Ltd. Vs Ms Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Ltd. — Arbitration | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~28

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 17/2026

¶4

DEE VEE PROJECTS LTD .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Charu Sangwan, Ms. Harshita Tyagi & Mr. Shubham Dayma, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

MS HINDUSTAN URVARAK AND RASAYAN LTD

¶8

.....Respondent

¶9

Through: Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Mr. Vikran Singh Baid & Mr. Ajitesh Garg, Advs. (through VC).

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

% 07.01.2026

¶13

This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.

¶14

Earlier the order dated 21.07.2025 was passed which is reproduced below:

¶15

“1. This petition under Section 29A (4) & (5) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed seeking extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for making the arbitral award.

¶16

Material on record discloses that this Court vide Order dated 04.08.2023 in ARB.P.614/2023, appointed Mr. Justice (Retd.) Krishna Murari, Former Judge Supreme Court of India, as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate on the disputes

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 12:08:26

¶19

between the parties. The mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal was extended for a period of six months, i.e. till 24.07.2024, by way of mutual consent. It is stated that the proceedings are at the stage of final hearing. The Petitioner has, therefore, approached this Court seeking extension of the mandate of the Arbitrator.

¶20

Learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent on advance notice states that the Respondent does not have any objection to the present Petition.

¶21

In view of the fact that the matter is at an advance stage, this Court is inclined to extend the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal 31.12.2025 so that the Award can be pronounced.

¶22

The Petition is disposed of along with the pending applications, if any.”

¶23

Learned counsel for the non-applicant has no serious objection to the prayer made.

¶24

In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by one month.

¶25

This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶26

AVNEESH JHINGAN, J

¶27

JANUARY 7, 2026 ‘JK’

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 12:08:26

Dee Vee Projects Ltd. v. Ms Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dee Vee Projects Ltd. v. Ms Hindustan Urvarak and Rasayan Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/S Taurant Projects Ltd. Vs M/S Gail India Ltd.

Shree Hospital Equipments through Its Proprietor Mr. Dhanaji Bhatale Alias Dhananjay Bhatale Vs Action Construction Equipment Limited

Mrs Inderjit Chhabra & Ors. Vs Ms Athena Infrastructres Ltd.

M/S D Thakkar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs Container Corporation of India Ltd.

M/S Agarwal Associates Promoters Limited Vs M/S Sharda Developers through Its Properietor

Ebixcash Mobility Software India Ltd. Vs Delhi Transport Corporation

M/S Lnj Power Ventures Limited Vs M/S Rswm Ltd.

M/S Brijesh Kumar and Associates Vs Delhi Development Authority

Mahaveer Singh Rajawat Vs M/S Radha Sarweshwar Marble and Granite & Ors.

M/S Taurant Projects Ltd. Vs M/S Gail India Ltd.

Ivy Entertainment Private Limited Vs People Media Factory Private Limited & Ors.

Sumant Kumar Sood & Ors. Vs Satish Kumar Sood & Ors.

M/S. a K Gulati and Sons Vs Union of India

Ramacivil India Construction Pvt. Ltd. Vs Delhi Transco Limited