Arbitration extension petition under Section 29A seeking more time to conclude proceedings; respondent raised no serious objection, and the court extended the period by six months and disposed of the petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
STERLITE TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Dhingra, Mr. Rohit Mahajan & Mr. Siddharth Agrawal, Advs.
versus
BHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Leena & Ms. Ishita Kadyan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN
AVNEESH JHINGAN, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2026/ ‘JK’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 13:50:04
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the time period for concluding arbitration proceedings should be extended under Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sterlite Technologies Limited
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
Avneesh Jhingan
As recorded by the court registry
A miscellaneous application in an arbitration matter, commonly seeking extension of the arbitral tribunal's mandate under Section 29A.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
