Disposed¶13

Sunil Dehal v. Kulbir Kaur & Ors.

Delhi HC22 Jan 2026FAO (COMM)/17/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

FAO (COMM) 17/2026, Sunil Dehal v. Kulbir Kaur & Ors., High Court of Delhi, order dated 22.01.2026 (Sambre and Digpaul, JJ.). Withdrawal of appeal permitted on counsel's motion; appellant has remedy of participating in execution proceedings initiated by respondent; liberty granted; any objection in execution proceedings to be decided by Executing Court per Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, uninfluenced by the withdrawal; appeal and pending CM applications disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to the appellant to withdraw the appeal as prayed; if he participates in the execution proceedings through an objection, his rights to be considered by the Executing Court in accordance with Order XXI CPC, 1908, uninfluenced by the withdrawal; appeal and pending applications, if any, disposed of. ¶13

Sunil Dehal Vs Kulbir Kaur & Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶13

Issue for consideration

Whether the appellant's motion for withdrawal of the appeal should be accepted and the appeal disposed of, and how the appellant's rights are to be treated if he participates in the respondent-initiated execution proceedings.

¶9

Court's answer

Since counsel for the appellant, on instructions, sought withdrawal of the proceedings having the remedy of participating in the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent, the Bench deemed it appropriate to dispose of the present appeal, observing the liberty in favour of the appellant as prayed.

¶10

Ratio / Principle

If the appellant participates in the execution proceedings through an objection, his rights shall be considered by the Executing Court in accordance with the scheme of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, without being influenced by the withdrawal of the present appeal.

¶10

Key takeaways

In view of the aforesaid terms, the appeal, along with the pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.ratio¶13

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi (Nitin Wasudeo Sambre and Ajay Digpaul, JJ.), order dated 22.01.2026 in FAO (COMM) 17/2026, Sunil Dehal v. Kulbir Kaur & Ors.: Counsel for the appellant, on instructions, moved for withdrawal of the appeal as he had the remedy of participating in the execution proceedings initiated by the respondent. The Bench disposed of the appeal with liberty to the appellant as prayed, observing that if the appellant participates in the execution proceedings through an objection, his rights would be considered by the Executing Court in accordance with the scheme of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, without being influenced by the withdrawal of the appeal. The appeal, along with the pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

Sunil Dehal v. Kulbir Kaur & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunil Dehal v. Kulbir Kaur & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anil Kumar Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/Avato Ward 103 Zone 9 Delhi

Shagun Goel Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.

J.B.D Enterprises Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/ Avato, WARD-70, ZONE-4 & Anr.

Ls Cable India Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs Group Iv, Acc(Import) & Ors.

M/S Meever India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mil Vehicles and Technologies Private Limited Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Cgst Okhla Division Cgst Delhi South & Ors.