Partly allowed

Shagun Goel v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.

Delhi HC21 Jan 2026W.P.(C)/870/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court held that the provisional attachment order under Section 83 of the CGST Act ceased to operate after one year due to non-compliance by the Respondents. It declared the attachment on both the specified bank account and a clubbed savings account as non-operational and partly allowed the writ petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition partly allowed; provisional attachment declared non-operational from 2nd June 2025.

Shagun Goel Vs Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr. — Money Laundering | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~74

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 870/2026 & CM APPL. 4284/2026

¶4

SHAGUN GOEL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Jitin Singhal and Mr. Pravesh Bahuguna, Advs.

¶6

versus

¶7

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE & ANR.

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur and Mr. Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Amol Sharma, Mr. Ateev Mathur and Mr. Sanjay Gupta, Advs. for R-2

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL

¶11

% 21.01.2026

¶12

CM APPL. 4283/2026

¶13

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

The application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(C) 870/2026

¶16

In exercise of powers under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter “the Act”), an order of provisional attachment of Bank Account No. 135605500936, IFSC Code : ICIC0006295 came to be passed.

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:16:13

¶19

As a sequel of above, there is an embargo on the right of the petitioner to operate the said account.

¶20

Drawing support from Section 83 (2) of the Act, it is urged by the counsel for the petitioner that the provisional attachment shall cease to operate after a lapse of a period of one year from the date of order of provisional attachment which in this case is 3^rd June, 2024.

¶21

Thus, we observe that the order of provisional attachment has ceased to operate from 2^nd June, 2025, however, the bank and the respondent have failed to act as per statutory mandate under Section 83 (2) of the Act. 7. The counsel for the respondent submits that since the proceedings are still continuing, this Court may pass an order in accordance with the law. 8. The provisional attachment is empowered in favour of the respondent by virtue of Section 83 (1) of the Act. Such provisional attachment is valid for a period of one year from the date of the order and in case, if the appropriate action of the recovery is not effected, it appears that the said provisional attachment ceases to operate by virtue of statutory provision provided under Section 83 (2) of the Act.

¶22

In this case, it has been rightly pointed out by counsel for the petitioner that the provisional attachment order was issued on 3^rd June, 2024 and the period of one year has expired on 2^nd June, 2025. 10. In that view of the matter, the effect of Section 83 (2) of the Act will be that the order of provisional attachment shall cease to operate post 2^nd June, 2025 in relation to the bank account which is referred in the impugned order dated 3^rd June, 2024, which is already reproduced hereinabove.

¶23

This takes us to the next submission of the counsel for petitioner that the Savings Bank Account No. 072401004328; IFSC Code: ICIC0000724

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:16:13

¶26

was never directed to be attached under Section 83 of the Act. It is claimed by him that since the said account is clubbed with the PAN Card Number which is referred to in the order of provisional attachment dated 3^rd June, 2024, the said account also stood provisionally attached.

¶27

From the record, we hardly find any justifiable material including that of an order under Section 83 of Act thereby attaching the said Savings Bank Account.

¶28

Even if the Form, which is provided under the Act, provides for the provisional attachment of the aforesaid Savings Bank Account, we are left with no other option to hold that even for the attachment of the said Savings Bank Account as well, the period of one year has also lapsed. 14. That being so, the petition stands partly allowed in terms of the prayer clause (a) which reads as under:

¶29

“(a) issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or directions, quashing of the impugned order dated 03.06.2024 passed by the learned Pr. Additional Director General, Gurugram Zonal Unit whereby Saving Bank Account 072401004328 of the petitioner maintained at ICICI Bank Ltd. (IFSC No. ICIC0000724), Pitampura, New Delhi were provisionally attached under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act, 2017; and/or”

¶30

We hereby declare that the provisional attachment ordered on 3^rd June, 2024, vide the impugned order under Section 83 of the Act, in relation to M/s Aanya Traders bearing Bank A/c No. 135605500936, IFSC Code : ICIC0006295 with the ICICI Bank Ltd., Garg Plaza, 5 Community Centre, Sector-8, Rohini, Delhi – 110085 and Savings Bank Account No. 072401004328; IFSC Code: ICIC0000724 in relation to the petitioner, is non-operational under the provisions of Section 83 (2) of the Act.

¶31

This is a digitally signed order.

¶32

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:16:13

¶33

We deem it appropriate to partly allow the petition in view of the above terms. Accordingly, the petition along with pending applications, if any, stands disposed of.

¶34

NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J

¶35

AJAY DIGPAUL, J

¶36

JANUARY 21, 2026/gs/ryp

¶37

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2026 at 13:16:13

Shagun Goel v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shagun Goel v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ritesh Singh Vs Nclt Registrar & Ors.

Shaheeda Begum Qureshi & Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi College of Engineering, Technical Staff Association (Regd.) Vs Delhi Technological University & Ors.

Venkatachalam Thangavelu Vs Ito, Ward 70(1), Delhi

MD Nasimuddin Ansari Vs Union of India and Ors.

Anchal Bhatheja & Anr. Vs Icici Bank Limited and Ors.

Pawan Kumar Matto Vs Honble High Court of Delhi through Its Registrar General

Mil Vehicles and Technologies Private Limited Vs Deputy/Assistant Commissioner, Cgst Okhla Division Cgst Delhi South & Ors.

J.B.D Enterprises Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/ Avato, WARD-70, ZONE-4 & Anr.

Saidakhon Mukhamedjanova Vs Commissioner of Customs

M/S Dca Workshop through Its Partner Amit Aurora Vs Assistant Commissioner Cgst Delhi South

Anil Kumar Vs Sales Tax Officer Class Ii/Avato Ward 103 Zone 9 Delhi

Ls Cable India Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Assistant Commissioner of Customs Group Iv, Acc(Import) & Ors.

M/S Meever India Private Limited Vs Union of India & Ors.