The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's application to withdraw the suit for partition of the deceased's estate. The court dismissed the suit as withdrawn and granted liberty to specific defendants to file fresh suits regarding partition.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to Defendants No. 2 & 3 to file fresh suits for partition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
SMT. SANDHYA AGARWAL .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. L. K. Singh, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Nitin Singh Kathayat, Advs.,
versus
SHRI RAJIV KUMAR & ORS. .....Defendants
Through: Mr. Abhishek Bansal, Mr. Sumit Kariwal, Advocates for D-1 Mr Rishabh Kapur, Mr Tanmay Gupta, Advocates for Defendant No 2&3
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 18.03.2026
I.A. 32869/2025
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2026 at 13:06:48
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
MARCH 18, 2026/ Rahul
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/03/2026 at 13:06:48
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Plaintiff is permitted to withdraw the present suit for partition of the family estate.
Whether Defendants No. 2 & 3 are granted liberty to file fresh suits for partition.
Smt. Sandhya Agarwal
Shri Rajiv Kumar & Ors.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
