Disposed¶46

Lt Foods Limited & Anr. v. M/S Ashish Traders

Delhi HC20 Feb 2026CS(COMM)/885/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

LT Foods Limited & Anr. v. M/s Ashish Traders; CS(COMM) 885/2025; Delhi High Court; Tushar Rao Gedela; consent decree; disposal of suit by settlement; Settlement Agreement 11.12.2025; Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC; Section 151 CPC; DAAWAT; ROYAL; DAWAT; trademark infringement; well-known mark; Trade Marks Act 1999; copyright; passing off; trade dress; get-up; colour scheme; label design; refund of court fees; Section 16 Court Fees Act 1870; Section 89 CPC; decree sheet; undertakings by defendant.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025; decree sheet to be drawn up accordingly; suit disposed of alongwith all pending applications; plaintiffs entitled to refund of Court Fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 upon completion of formalities. ¶46

Lt Foods Limited & Anr. Vs M/S Ashish Traders — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

¶46

Issue for consideration

Whether the suit CS(COMM) 885/2025 should be decreed and disposed of in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025 pursuant to the joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC, and whether the settlement terms are lawful.

¶43

Court's answer

The Court perused the terms of the settlement and found them lawful and within the contours of Order XXII Rule 3 (as printed; the application invokes Order XXIII Rule 3) read with Section 151 CPC.

¶38

Ratio / Principle

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.

¶42

Key takeaways

A decree sheet was ordered to be drawn up in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.ratio¶44
The plaintiffs are entitled to refund of Court Fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, upon completion of all formalities as per the rules.ratio¶45
The Suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all pending applications, if any.ratio

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

High Court of Delhi (Tushar Rao Gedela, J.), acting on a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 CPC, decreed and disposed of CS(COMM) 885/2025 (LT Foods Limited & Anr. v. M/s Ashish Traders) in terms of a Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025. Per the settlement, the defendant acknowledged the plaintiffs' proprietorship of the 'DAAWAT' and 'ROYAL' trademarks/labels and their registration and goodwill in India and abroad, acknowledged 'DAAWAT' as a well-known mark within the meaning of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and undertook to refrain from producing, selling, advertising, promoting, exporting or enabling advertising of any packaging bearing marks identical or deceptively similar to 'DAWAT'/'ROYAL', from infringing the plaintiffs' copyright in the artistic work, trade dress and label design, and from passing off its goods by using packaging, get-up, colour scheme, design or trade dress identical or deceptively similar to the plaintiffs'. The Court found the settlement terms lawful and within the contours of Order XXII Rule 3 (as printed) read with Section 151 CPC, held the parties bound by the agreement, ordered a decree sheet to be drawn, decreed and disposed of the suit alongwith pending applications, and entitled the plaintiffs to refund of Court Fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 upon completion of formalities.

¶1

$~29

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 885/2025, I.A. 20741/2025 & I.A. 20745/2025

¶4

LT FOODS LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. R. Abhishek, Mr. Praveen Kumar, Mr. Sidhi Pramodh Rayudu and Mr. Avinash Sharma, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

M/S ASHISH TRADERS .....Defendant Through: Mr. Ankur Vyas, Advocate (Through VC)

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

¶9

O R D E R % 20.02.2026

¶10

I.A. 4784/2026 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)

¶11

This is an application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (hereinafter referred to as ‘ CPC ’) filed jointly on behalf of the plaintiffs as also the defendant.

¶12

Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that an out of Court settlement resolving the disputes between the parties has fructified and the terms of settlement have been reduced into writing vide the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.

¶13

The said Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025 is appended to the application as Document-A.

¶14

The terms of settlement commence from page no.15 from para (i) to (xiii) which are reproduced hereunder:-

¶15

“i. The Defendant acknowledges and confirms that the Plaintiffs are the proprietors of the trademarks/labels "DAAWAT'' and "ROYAL" and related marks, the details of which are set out in

¶16

CS(COMM) 885/2025 Page 1 of 4

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:13:49

¶19

Annexure - B & C respectively hereto, and that such marks are registered in India and abroad and enjoy extensive reputation and goodwill.

¶20

ii. The Defendant expressly acknowledges and accepts that the trademark/label 'DAAWAT' is a well-known mark belonging to the Plaintiffs within the meaning of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, and that the Plaintiffs enjoy an extensive and enforceable reputation and goodwill in the said mark.

¶21

iii. The Defendant hereby undertakes to restrain itself, its directors, its principal officers, family members, servants, agents, vendors, dealers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and anyone acting for and on its behalf from producing, selling, offering for sale or advertising, promoting its goods or services, exporting or enabling advertising campaigns either directly or indirectly in physical/electronic form, internet, websites or in any manner any product packaging bearing the mark /label "DAWAT" or "ROYAL' in conjunction with any other word which is identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs marks /labels of "DAWAT" or "ROYAL" or related marks, or in a manner so as to suggest an affiliation approval, license, connection, sponsorship or endorsement with the Plaintiffs so as to result in Infringement.

¶22

iv. The Defendant hereby undertakes to restrain itself, its directors its principal officers, family members, servants, agents, vendors, dealers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and anyone acting for and on its behalf from producing, selling, offering for sale or advertising, promoting its goods or services, exporting or enabling advertising campaigns either directly or indirectly in physical/electronic form, internet, websites or in any manner any product packaging bearing the mark/label “DAWAT” or ”ROYAL” in conjunction with any other word which is identical or deceptively similar to the Plaintiffs marks /labels of "DAWAT" or ”ROYAL” or related marks, or in a manner so as to suggest an affiliation, ~ approval, license, connection, sponsorship or endorsement with the Plaintiffs so as to result in Infringement.

¶23

v. The Defendant hereby undertakes to restrain itself, its directors, its principal officers, family members, servants, agents, vendors, dealers, manufacturers, distributors, retailers and anyone acting for and on its behalf from infringing the copyright of the Plaintiffs in the trademark ''DAWAT" or "ROYAL" and related marks.

¶24

vi. The Defendant further undertakes to refrain from passing off its goods or business as those of the Plaintiffs by using packaging, get-up, colour scheme, design, or trade dress identical or deceptively similar to those used by the Plaintiffs for

¶25

CS(COMM) 885/2025 Page 2 of 4

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:13:49

¶28

their "DAAWAT" and "'ROYAL" brands

¶29

vii. The Defendant undertakes to refrain from infringing the Plaintiffs' copyright in the artistic work, trade dress, and label design associated with the trademarks "DAAWAT" and "ROYAL" and related marks.

¶30

viii. The Plaintiffs shall be entitled to inform the public at large about the amicable resolution of the dispute and the protection of their intellectual property rights through print, digital, or other public media as they deem appropriate.

¶31

ix. The present suit, being CS (COMM) No. 885 of 2025, may be disposed of by the Hon 'ble Court in terms of this Settlement Agreement.

¶32

x. The Plaintiffs shall be entitled to apply for refund of the court fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, read with Section 89 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

¶33

xi. The Parties confirm and declare that they have voluntarily and of their own free will entered into this Settlement Agreement and that the same shall be binding on their respective successors, administrators, sister concerns, directors, partners, subsidiaries, and all those acting for and on their behalf.

¶34

xii. This Settlement Agreement ·constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties and supersedes all prior communications and representations relating to the subject matter hereof.

¶35

xiii. That the parties undertake that they are bound by this Settlement Agreement and further undertake to abide by the terms and conditions set out in the agreement and not to dispute the same hereinafter in future.”

¶36

The Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025 alongwith the affidavits of both the parties are taken on record. The other documents like Document-B, C, D and E are also taken on record.

¶37

Learned counsel for the parties submits that there is no compliance left to be completed.

¶38

This Court has perused the terms of settlement and finds them lawful and the settlement terms are within the contours of Order XXII Rule 3, read with Section 151 CPC.

¶39

CS(COMM) 885/2025 Page 3 of 4

¶40

This is a digitally signed order.

¶41

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:13:49

¶42

The parties shall remain bound by the terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.

¶43

There is no impediment in case this Court decrees the Suit in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.

¶44

Let a decree sheet be drawn up in terms of the Settlement Agreement dated 11.12.2025.

¶45

The plaintiffs shall be entitled to refund of Court Fees under Section 16 of the Court Fees Act, 1870, upon completion of all formalities as per the rules.

¶46

The Suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all pending applications, if any.

¶47

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J

¶48

FEBRUARY 20, 2026

¶49

Sumit

¶50

CS(COMM) 885/2025 Page 4 of 4

¶51

This is a digitally signed order.

¶52

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/02/2026 at 12:13:49

Lt Foods Limited & Anr. v. M/S Ashish Traders

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lt Foods Limited & Anr. v. M/S Ashish Traders

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Spice Nest Impex Private Limited

Genesis Dream Merchants Pvt. Ltd. Vs Usha Bansal & Ors.

Ms Sk Educations Pvt. Ltd. Vs Rainbow Educational Society West Rakshapuram & Ors.

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Tapovan Foods Private Limited

J. B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs Mensa Futura Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Nectar Biopharma Private Limited & Anr.

Boehringer Ingelheim International Gmbh Vs Mr X Trading as Messrs Amar Medical Store & Ors.

Flamagas, S.A. & Anr. Vs Rohit Ahuja

Itc Limited & Anr. Vs a and H Hospitality & Anr.

Patanjali Ayurved Limited Vs Mangalam Organics Limited & Anr.

Capital Foods Private Limited Vs Tapovan Foods Private Limited

Poly Medicure Limited Vs 1. Romson Scientific and Surgical, Industries Pvt. Ltd.

J. B. Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs Mensa Futura Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.

Guru Harkrishan Public School Vs Directorate of Education & Anr.