Revision petition against respondents became infructuous after the trial court acquitted respondent nos. 1 and 3 and respondent no. 2 expired. The amicus curiae was discharged following appearance of counsel for respondent no. 1, and the petition along with pending application was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
STATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Mr. Dinesh Kumar, Mr. Ashish Mahani, Mr. Bhuman Bansal and Ms. Upasana Bakshi, Advocates with SI Anil, PS.: Seemapuri
Versus
AMIR KHAN & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vishvendra Verma, Adv. for R- 1 (through VC)
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 17.03.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:45:31
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MARCH 17, 2026/ bh
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/03/2026 at 12:45:31
State
Amir Khan
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
