The petitioner's counsel stated the bank account had been defreezed, rendering the petition infructuous. The court disposed of the writ petition and the pending application.
Petition disposed of as infructuous; pending application also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
CNR No. DLHC010113832026
ARUN KUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Counsel (appearance not given) versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Counsel for UOI via VC (appearance not given). Mr. Dinesh Chandra Tripathi, Advocate for R7 (VC).
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 16.09.2026
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 / tr
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:53:00
Arun Kumar
Union of India
Purusha Indra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
