Dismissed¶85

Rakesh Babbar v. State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ors.

Delhi HC13 May 2026CRL.M.C./9272/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Rakesh Babbar v State of NCT of Delhi through SHO & Ors.; CRL.M.C. 9272/2024 to CRL.M.C. 9280/2024 (with CRL.M.A. 35557/2024 et seq.); High Court of Delhi; Madhu Jain, J.; decided 13.05.2026; petitions dismissed as withdrawn on settlement between parties and clearance of pending payments; no merits adjudication, no statute or precedent discussed.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the petitions granted; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; accompanying CRL.M.A. applications allowed and disposed of. ¶85

Rakesh Babbar Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ors. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~56-64

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 9272/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35557/2024

¶4

RAKESH BABBAR

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO ORS.

¶9

.....Respondents

¶10

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶11

¶12

CRL.M.C. 9273/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35559/2024 RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶13

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶14

versus

¶15

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶16

.....Respondents

¶17

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶18

¶19

CRL.M.C. 9274/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35561/2024

¶20

RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶21

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶22

versus

¶23

STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶24

¶25

CRL.M.C. 9275/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35563/2024 RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶26

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:19:47

¶29

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶30

.....Respondents

¶31

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶32

¶33

- CRL.M.C. 9276/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35566/2024

¶34

RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶35

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶36

versus

¶37

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶38

.....Respondents

¶39

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶40

¶41

- CRL.M.C. 9277/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35571/2024

¶42

RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶43

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶44

versus

¶45

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶46

.....Respondents

¶47

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶48

¶49

- CRL.M.C. 9278/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35573/2024

¶50

RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioners

¶51

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶52

versus

¶53

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THORUGH SHO & ORS.

¶54

.....Respondents

¶55

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶56

¶57

- CRL.M.C. 9279/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35576/2024 RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶58

This is a digitally signed order.

¶59

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:19:47

¶60

Through:

¶61

versus

¶62

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶63

.....Respondents

¶64

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶65

¶66

- CRL.M.C. 9280/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35580/2024

¶67

RAKESH BABBAR .....Petitioner

¶68

Through: Avneet Singh Sikka & Japneet Kaur, Advs.

¶69

versus

¶70

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO & ORS.

¶71

.....Respondents

¶72

Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP.

¶73

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN

O R D E R

13.05.2026

This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

¶78

CRL.M.A. 35558/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9272/2024 CRL.M.A. 35560/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9273/2024 CRL.M.A. 35562/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9274/2024 CRL.M.A. 35564/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9275/2024 CRL.M.A. 35567/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9276/2024 CRL.M.A. 35572/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9277/2024 CRL.M.A. 35574/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9278/2024 CRL.M.A. 35577/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9279/2024 CRL.M.A. 35581/2024 in CRL.M.C. 9280/2024

¶79

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶80

Applications stand disposed of.

¶81

CRL.M.C. 9272/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35557/2024

¶82

This is a digitally signed order.

¶83

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:19:47

¶84

CRL.M.C. 9273/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35559/2024 CRL.M.C. 9274/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35561/2024 CRL.M.C. 9275/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35563/2024 CRL.M.C. 9276/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35566/2024 CRL.M.C. 9277/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35571/2024 CRL.M.C. 9278/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35573/2024 CRL.M.C. 9279/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35576/2024 CRL.M.C. 9280/2024 & CRL.M.A. 35580/2024

¶85

The Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the matter has been settled between the parties, all pending payments have been cleared, and she seeks permission to withdraw the petitions. In view of the submissions made, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

¶86

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith.

¶87

MADHU JAIN, J.

¶88

MAY 13, 2026/ vs/rm

¶89

This is a digitally signed order.

¶90

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/05/2026 at 11:19:47

Rakesh Babbar v. State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rakesh Babbar v. State of NCT of Delhi through SHO Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr. Davinder Sharma & Ors. Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Mithlesh Jha and Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) and Anr.

Raj Kumar Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rakesh Babbar Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO & Ors.

Chander Shekhar Sharma Vs the State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Gaurav & Anr. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.