Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner did not appear on multiple occasions and the State submitted the matter was rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
CNR No. DLHC010087652026
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with Mr. Alok Sharma, Ms. Sonia Malhotra and Ms. Pavitra Dixit, Advocates. SI Ankit, P.S: Moti Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2026 aks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/09/2026 at 11:52:58
Sameer Malik
The State (NCT of Delhi) & Ors.
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
