Petitioners sought leave to withdraw their writ petitions; the Delhi High Court disposed of the petitions as withdrawn and the pending applications as infructuous. No substantive ruling was made.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17 to 19
versus
UION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE & ORS.
.....Respondents UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Himanshu Pathak, SPC with Mr.Chetan Sharma, Adv. (through VC) in W.P.(CRL) 4041/2024 Mr.Ishkaran Singh Bhandari CGSC with Mr.Piyush Yadav, Adv. for UOI in W.P.(CRL) 635/2025 Mr.Shashank Dixit, CGSC with Mr.Kunal Raj and Mr.Ayush Kumar Shukla, Advs. for UOI in W.P.(CRL) 707/2025
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 12.01.2026
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:48:33
pending applications also stand disposed of as infructuous.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
JANUARY 12, 2026 /ns/DG
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 13:48:33
Tendu Tashi & Anr.
Tenzin Dhargyal & Anr.
Urgin Lundup & Anr.
Union of India Ministry of Finance & Ors.
Navin Chawla
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
