Petitioners sought to withdraw the writ petition; after partly arguing, counsel on instructions sought permission, and the petition with accompanying application was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~73
Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Srivastava, Mr. G.S. Panwar and Mr. Ashish, Advocates.
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI& ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC with SI Satish Kumar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R % 11.02.2026
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
FEBRUARY 11, 2026/ ry
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/02/2026 at 14:19:24
Pankaj & Anr.
State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
