Allowed¶16

Vicky v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Jan 2026W.P.(CRL)/4339/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Habeas corpus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Delhi High Court; W.P.(CRL); marriage of choice; wife produced before Court; declared major; voluntary marriage without coercion; release to husband; petition allowed and disposed; vacation judges Shail Jain and Madhu Jain; order dated 02.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

Ms Shivani allowed to go with the Petitioner from the Court itself; the Petition, along with the pending application (CRL.M.A. 39032/2025), disposed of. ¶16

Vicky Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~4

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 4339/2025, CRL.M.A. 39032/2025 VICKY ....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Mr. Akhilesh Kumar Singh & Mr. Anil Kumar Singh, Advs.

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel with Ms. Priyam Agrawal, Mr. Abhinav Kumar & Mr. Aryan Sachdeva, Advs.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICESHAIL JAIN HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN O R D E R % 02.01.2026

¶8

The present Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus for the production of one Ms Shivani, in favour of the Petitioner and against the Respondents.

¶9

The brief facts, as stated in the Petition, are that the Petitioner herein married Ms Shivani on 06.12.2025. Ms Shivani is stated to be a major, her date of birth being November 2006. It is further stated that on the same day as that of the solemnization of marriage between the parties, the family members of Ms Shivani, namely Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, took her away on the pretext of solemnising the marriage as per the ceremonies, and she has

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/01/2026 at 11:46:06

¶12

not returned thereafter.

¶13

Today, the ld.Counsel appearing on behalf of the GNCTD submits that Ms Shivani has been produced before this Court, and that she is a major. Her mother and brother are also present in the Court. Further, Ms Shivani has submitted before this Court that she has married the Petitioner, Mr Vicky, out of her own volition and without any pressure or coercion, and that she is willing to reside with the Petitioner, Mr Vicky.

¶14

The Petitioner has also stated that he is 24 years old and is working as a carpenter in Narela, Delhi.

¶15

Considering the fact that Ms Shivani wants to live with her husband, the Petitioner, Mr Vicky, and the Petitioner as well is interested in living with Ms Shivani, the Petition is thereby allowed, and Ms Shivani is allowed to go with the Petitioner from the Court itself.

¶16

The Petition, along with the pending application, is disposed of.

¶17

SHAIL JAIN, J (VACATION JUDGE)

¶18

MADHU JAIN, J (VACATION JUDGE)

¶19

JANUARY 2, 2026/ prg/k/MM

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/01/2026 at 11:46:06

Vicky v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vicky v. State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Zainul Abideen Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Saleem Ahmed through Parokar Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Amit @Nitu Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Abhishek Kumar Vs Neha Lal

Vikram Dey Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Dawood Shabir Bangroo & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sourav Sekhar Behera Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Vinod @ Vinode @ Bhole Vs the State (Govt of Nct) Delhi