Siddharth @ Raja v. State (Nct of Delhi)
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition became infructuous after punishment was reduced and lapsed, and petitioner accepted charges; disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Anmol Pandey, Ms. Jyoti Yadav, Mr. Nitin Yadav and Mr. Vikas Deep, Advocates.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Advocates with SI Sumit, PS Aman Vihar
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R
% 06.02.2026
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
FEBRUARY 06, 2026/So
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 13:07:36
Siddharth @ Raja
State (NCT of Delhi)
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court