Petitioner sought to challenge rejection of his parole application, but the jail authorities rejected it afresh during pendency; counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to file afresh on the new rejection order.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh based on the parole rejection order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~120
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 290/2026 & CRL.M.A. 15699/2026
PANKAJ @ DABBU .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shannu Baghel with Ms. Sonam Tomar, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 15.05.2026
The matter has been mentioned by Mr. Shannu Baghel, learned counsel for the petitioner submitting, that the jail authorities have rejected the petitioner’s parole application today. A copy of the rejection order has been furnished to the petitioner.
In view thereof, Mr. Baghel seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file afresh seeking appropriate relief based on the rejection order.
Petition stands disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. The date of 14.08.2026 given earlier, stands cancelled.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
MAY 15, 2026 ds
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/05/2026 at 12:52:22
Pankaj @ Dabbu
State of NCT of Delhi
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
