Dismissed¶15

Shravan v. State & Anr.

Delhi HC12 Jan 2026CRL.M.C./27/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Delhi High Court; Prateek Jalan, J.; 12.01.2026; CRL.M.C. 27/2020 & CRL.M.A. 109/2020 (Stay); petition against charge-framing order dated 04.11.2016 in FIR No. 262/2016 dated 16.04.2016; cross FIR No. 263/2016 P.S. R.K. Puram; CRL. M.C. No. 2768/2025 (quashing of cross FIR); parties unwilling to proceed; petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh for quashing of FIR No. 262/2016.

What did the court decide?

Dismissal as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh seeking quashing of FIR No. 262/2016. ¶15

Shravan Vs State & Anr. — Delhi HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

$~123

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 27/2020 & CRL.M.A. 109/2020 (Stay) SHRAVAN .....Petitioner

¶4

Through: Ms. Kavitha K.T., Advocate. versus STATE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Wali, APP. Mr. Fahim Khan, Advocate for R- 2.

¶5

CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

¶6

O R D E R % 12.01.2026

¶7

The present petition is directed against the order dated 04.11.2016, whereby charges have been framed in the case arising out of FIR No. 262/2016 dated 16.04.2016.

¶8

Ms. Kavitha, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the said FIR arose out of a neighborhood quarrel, and that the family of the petitioner has also lodged a cross FIR against the family of the complainant [respondent No.2 herein], being FIR No. 263/2016, registered at P.S. R.K. Puram on 16.04.2016. She further submits that, in both cases, the parties do not wish to proceed further. In fact, the accused in the said cross FIR, have already filed CRL. M.C. No. 2768/2025 seeking quashing thereof.

¶9

Ms. Kavitha, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present

¶10

CRL.M.C. 27/2020 Page 1 of 2

¶11

This is a digitally signed order.

¶12

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 12:14:42

¶13

petition, with liberty to file afresh, seeking quashing of FIR No. 262/2016 on the basis of the aforesaid submissions.

¶14

Mr. Fahim Khan, learned counsel for the complainant in the present FIR [respondent No.2 herein], confirms the aforesaid position and submits that the parties do not wish to proceed with the criminal proceedings, and that respondent No.2 is willing to enter into a settlement with the complainant in the cross FIR.

¶15

In view of the above, the petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as aforesaid.

¶16

PRATEEK JALAN, J

¶17

JANUARY 12, 2026 SV/SD/

¶18

CRL.M.C. 27/2020 Page 2 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/01/2026 at 12:14:42

Shravan v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shravan v. State & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kashmiri Devi Vs the State Gnctd & Anr.

Mohd Rajibuddin Vs Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

Raghubir Singh Alias Raghuvir Shing Kashana & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Rajesh @ Golu Vs the State of NCT of Delhi

Bimal Ramgopal Agarwal Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Shri Arun Jain & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.