Bail application and connected applications before the Delhi High Court were not pressed; counsel sought permission to withdraw, and the Court dismissed the applications as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~66
MOHD RAJIBUDDIN .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Sangita Bhayana, Advocate.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC with Mr. Priyam Bhardwaj, Mr. D. Raj, Advocates.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
%
08.01.2026
After some hearing, Ms. Sangita Bhayana, learned counsel for the applicant, seeks permission to withdraw these applications.
The applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
JANUARY 8, 2026 “Bhupi/KA”/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/01/2026 at 11:39:56
MOHD RAJIBUDDIN
DIRECTORATE OF REVENUE INTELLIGENCE
PRATEEK JALAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
