High Court disposed of a petition where the petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty to file afresh, leading to dismissal of the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty granted to file afresh if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~92
CNR No. DLHC010409892026
PRAMOD @LANGRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Adv.
versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for State with SI Dinesh, PS: Subhash Place.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE
O R D E R % 07.09.2026
SAURABH BANERJEE, J.
SEPTEMBER 07, 2026 /bh
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2026 at 12:06:15
Pramod @ Langra
State (NCT of Delhi)
Saurabh Banerjee
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
