Allowed

D M v. State of NCT of Delhi

Delhi HC10 Sept 2026W.P.(CRL)/2193/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is an oral judgment allowing a writ petition seeking parole for a convicted person (D M). The court set aside the rejection order and directed the release on parole with specific conditions, relying on a detailed judgment in Jaswinder Singh vs State of NCT of Delhi.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed; rejection order set aside; petitioner released on parole for four weeks subject to conditions.

D M Vs State of NCT of Delhi — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2026)

¶1

$~14

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

% Date of Decision: 10.09.2026

¶4

CNR No. DLHC010331342026

¶5

- W.P.(CRL) 2193/2026

¶6

D M .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja B. Soni, Advodate.

¶7

versus

¶8

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent

¶9

Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with SI Sonu and SI Shivali.

¶10

CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

¶11

J U D G M E N T (ORAL)

¶12

Petitioner seeks quashing of rejection order No. F.18/13/2026/HG/ PRISONS/6195-97 dated 14.05.2026.

¶13

At the outset, learned ASC submits that in view of detailed judgment of this Court in the case of Jaswinder Singh vs State of NCT of Delhi , 2026:DHC:3375, State has no objection if this petition is allowed.

¶14

Basically, the impugned order rejected the request of the petitioner for grant of parole, which parole had been sought by him so as to enable him to file SLP.

¶15

W.P.(CRL) 2193/2026

¶16

Page 1 of 2 pages

¶17

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 GIRISH 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 KATHPALIA 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.10 16:46:06 +05'30'

¶18

Signature Not Verified

¶19

Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:1 0.09.2026 16:45:45

¶20

The detailed reasoning has already been recorded in the said judgment of Jaswinder Singh (supra), so the same is not being reiterated.

¶21

Therefore, the impugned order is set aside and the petition is allowed, thereby directing the release of the petitioner on parole for a period of four weeks subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned Jail Superintendent; and also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall furnish his mobile phone number and other details to the local police of his residential area and shall remain accessible by keeping his mobile phone switched on; and also subject to the condition that the petitioner shall furnish a copy of his SLP to the concerned Jail Superintendent at the time of his surrender after completion of his parole.

¶22

It is specifically directed that the petitioner shall not try to contact any of the prosecution witnesses in any manner whatsoever. It is also made clear that no extension of parole shall be granted to petitioner on any ground whatsoever.

¶23

Copy of this order be sent to the concerned Jail Superintendent for compliance. Accompanying application also stands disposed of.

¶24

Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec GIRISH 45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 KATHPALIA 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801 e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.09.10 16:45:54 +05'30'

¶25

GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE)

¶26

SEPTEMBER 10, 2026/ as

¶27

W.P.(CRL) 2193/2026

¶28

Page 2 of 2 pages

¶29

Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:DIKSHA RAWAT Signing Da te:1 0.09.2026 16:45:45

D M v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D M v. State of NCT of Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhoj Raj @ Bhoje Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Jawahar Lal Vs State of NCT Delhi & Ors.

Murugesan Manivannan Vs Union of India

Pankija Tehlan Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Ors.

Ms. Shagun Kumari Vs State NCT of Delhi

Ayushi Sharma Vs Commissioner of Police Delhi & Ors.

Nav Prem Collection & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Shikhir Aggarwal Vs Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr.