Writ petition seeking release on eight weeks' parole. The State reported that the petitioner's parole application had been rejected. The court directed that a copy of the rejection order be communicated to the petitioner and left him free to take recourse in accordance with law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~96
RAHUL GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rohan J. Alva (DHCLSC) and Mr. Anant Sanghi, Advocates.
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent
Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC for State
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R
% 22.07.2026
CRL.M.A. 21276/2026 (for exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 2126/2026
b. Pass any other order or further orders, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper on the facts and in the interest of justice.”
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:42:52
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
JULY 22, 2026/ Nc
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/07/2026 at 12:42:52
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, whose parole application was rejected by the State, is entitled to release on eight weeks' parole.
Rahul Gupta
State of NCT of Delhi
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
